Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| 2018-07-30 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 760 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G Plus is slightly better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, having a overall score of 82.6 against 82.2. The Moto G 5G Plus is a newer cellphone, and it is also lighter and notably thinner than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has an incredibly better screen than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 2160 x 3840 resolution and a way higher pixels number per inch of display.
The Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also has a greater amount of RAM. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a better camera than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video, a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with more storage for games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Moto G 5G Plus has a really longer battery life than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3540mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.