Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 760 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 Premium has a general score of 82.2, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 general score. Despite being the best in this review, it must be noted that it is also older, somewhat heavier and a lot thicker. The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a bit faster processor than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a lot better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per screen inch and a way higher 2160 x 3840px resolution. Motorola One Hyper captures just a bit better videos and photos than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photographs or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera.
The Motorola One Hyper has a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola One Hyper features a bit better battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 13% larger battery size.
Although Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Hyper. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola One Hyper, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.