Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is slightly better than Xperia XZ2 Premium's 82.2 global score. The Motorola razr (2020) construction is notably newer, lighter and way thinner than the Xperia XZ2 Premium. Xperia XZ2 Premium features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a much sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a way higher resolution of 2160 x 3840. Motorola razr (2020) takes much clearer videos and photos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited situations, a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way higher resolution camera.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3540mAh battery capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) costs more money than the Xperia XZ2 Premium, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.