Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Nokia |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 760 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 Premium has a global score of 82.2, which is a bit better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW's 80.3 global score. Despite being the best phone we compare here, Xperia XZ2 Premium is a noticeably older, thicker and a little heavier phone than Nokia 8 V 5G UW. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has a bit better CPU than Nokia 8 V 5G UW. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has a much better display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 2160 x 3840 pixels and a much greater screen pixels density. Nokia 8 V 5G UW features more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with superior battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3540mAh. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a better camera than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has higher video frame rates, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor and a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Although Xperia XZ2 Premium is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Nokia 8 V 5G UW. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Xperia XZ2 Premium, else you can save some money and buy the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.