Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a general score of 82.2, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's global score of 79.4. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, Xperia XZ2 Premium is a much older, somewhat heavier and a lot thicker phone than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM.
The Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot brighter display, a much higher resolution of 2160 x 3840 pixels and way more pixels per inch of screen. The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 400 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a superior battery life than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3540mAh. Galaxy A35 5G has a slightly better camera than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a way more MP back camera and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.