Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium's score of 82.2. Galaxy A51 5G is a newer cellphone, and it is also a lot thinner and incredibly lighter than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium. Xperia XZ2 Premium features a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of display and a much higher resolution of 2160 x 3840.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G. They have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM.
Galaxy A51 5G captures better photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photographs or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with improved battery life than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 27 percent larger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.