Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Xperia XZ2 Premium, with a 91.3 score against 82.2. The Galaxy A52 5G body is noticeably newer, incredibly thinner and lighter than the Xperia XZ2 Premium. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 2160 x 3840 resolution and much more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy A52 5G has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52 5G. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 5G has superior battery life than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3540mAh. Galaxy A52 5G captures better photographs and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot bigger camera sensor and a camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.