Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 760 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is much better than the Xperia XZ2 Premium's general score of 82.2. Galaxy A71 5G UW is a newer phone, and it's also much thinner and noticeably lighter than the Xperia XZ2 Premium. The Xperia XZ2 Premium features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Xperia XZ2 Premium has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 2160 x 3840 resolution and a lot greater pixel density. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much bigger memory for apps and games than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has more internal storage and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Galaxy A71 5G UW takes much clearer photographs and videos than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a way larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.