Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-07-30 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is better than Xperia XZ2 Premium, with a 97.6 score against 82.2. Although the Galaxy Fold is somewhat heavier than Xperia XZ2 Premium, it's extremely thinner and also newer. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a little better hardware performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory.
Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a way better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 2160 x 3840px resolution and a way higher pixel quantity per display inch. The Galaxy Fold counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has superior battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity instead of 3540mAh. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or videos in poorly lited environments and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures and a lot higher 19 mega-pixels resolution camera.
The Galaxy Fold costs a lot more than the Xperia XZ2 Premium, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.