Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the Xperia XZ2 Premium, with a general score of 98.9 against 82.2. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is noticeably newer, lighter and noticeably thinner than Xperia XZ2 Premium. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better processing power than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2160 x 3840 pixels resolution and a much greater number of pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better camera than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a camera with a much higher resolution, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features better battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 27% larger battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is more expensive than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.