Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| 2018-07-30 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium's score of 82.2. The Galaxy S10e is a noticeably lighter and way thinner cellphone than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, even though both of them were released only a few months apart. The Xperia XZ2 Premium and the Galaxy S10e count with very similar processors, both have 8 processing cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium also has much more pixels per inch of screen and a much higher 2160 x 3840 pixels resolution. Xperia XZ2 Premium shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a back camera with a way higher 19 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has 3540mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy S10e is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.