Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is better than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium's 82.2 global score. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a newer cellphone, and it is also a little bit lighter and noticeably thinner than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a better display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2160 x 3840 resolution and a higher pixels amount in each display inch. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better storage to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much higher 108 megapixels resolution back camera and a much higher video resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior battery life than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs more than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.