Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Xperia XZ2 Premium, having a global score of 95.4 against 82.2. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra design is noticeably newer, extremely thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Xperia XZ2 Premium. The Xperia XZ2 Premium features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller screen and much worse brightness, it also counts with a better resolution of 2160 x 3840px and a way higher number of pixels per inch in the display.
Xperia XZ2 Premium features a greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 400 GB. Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 41% more battery capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better camera than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures, a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera and a lot higher video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra costs more money than the Xperia XZ2 Premium, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.