Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than Xperia XZ2 Premium's score of 82.2. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also extremely lighter and thinner than the Xperia XZ2 Premium. Xperia XZ2 Premium features a way better display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better amount of pixels per display inch and a much higher 2160 x 3840 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better performance than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a better storage for applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 3540mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.