Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than Xperia XZ2 Premium's general score of 82.2. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is somewhat heavier than Xperia XZ2 Premium, it's way thinner and also way newer. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little better hardware performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater pixel count per screen inch and a much better 2160 x 3840 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium count with very similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a lower (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with much less mega pixels resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality pictures and videos.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has superior battery life than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3540mAh.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way more expensive than the Xperia XZ2 Premium, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.