Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, having a 90.6 score against 82.2. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is heavier than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, it's thinner and incredibly newer. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little bit better performance than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch in the display and a much better resolution of 2160 x 3840. The Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger aperture for better captures in low light situations and a lot higher 19 megapixels resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features improved battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.