Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Apple |
| 2017-04-05 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is better than Sony Xperia XZs's general score of 77.2. Although the iPhone X and the Sony Xperia XZs were released only 7 months apart, iPhone X's design is just a bit heavier but just a bit thinner than the Sony Xperia XZs. The iPhone X features a faster processing unit than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a 64-bits CPU.
The iPhone X features a slightly better display than Xperia XZs, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a bit more pixels per display inch. The iPhone X features a very superior storage to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
Sony Xperia XZs features just a bit longer battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 2900mAh battery size against 2716mAh. Sony Xperia XZs shoots much better videos and photos than iPhone X, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Sony Xperia XZs also counts with a back camera with way more MP, faster video frame rates and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Apple iPhone X costs a lot more money than Sony Xperia XZs, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.