Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Apple |
| 2017-04-05 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is slightly better than the Sony Xperia XZs, getting an 82 score against 77.2. The iPhone XR design is newer, but somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than Sony Xperia XZs. The Apple iPhone XR counts with a superior CPU than Xperia XZs, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a 64-bits CPU.
Apple iPhone XR counts with a bit better screen than Xperia XZs, because although it has a bit lower 828 x 1792 resolution and a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display. Xperia XZs has a very superior camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xperia XZs also counts with a larger sensor, faster 960 fps video frame rate and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
The Sony Xperia XZs features more storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone XR, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The iPhone XR features just a bit better battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has a 2942mAh battery size instead of 2900mAh.
IPhone XR is a bit more expensive than Xperia XZs, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.