Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| 2017-04-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is a little bit better than Xperia XZs's score of 77.2. The Google Pixel 3 is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Xperia XZs. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better looking screen than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a bit bigger display.
Google Pixel 3 features a bit faster processor than Sony Xperia XZs, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Google Pixel 3 also has a greater number of cores (and also faster). The Xperia XZs counts with a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The Xperia XZs features a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xperia XZs also counts with higher 960 frames per second video frame rate, a much higher resolution camera and a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
The Xperia XZs and the Google Pixel 3 both count with quite similar battery durations, although the Google Pixel 3 also has a 2915mAh battery size.
The Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.