Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| 2017-04-05 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than the Xperia XZs, having a general score of 82.9 against 77.2. Google Pixel 4 XL's design has the same thickness than the Xperia XZs, but it is somewhat heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xperia XZs, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit more vivid display than Xperia XZs, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px, a bigger screen and more pixels per screen inch. Xperia XZs counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xperia XZs also counts with a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality, higher video frame rate and a way higher 19 megapixels resolution camera.
Sony Xperia XZs features more storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The Google Pixel 4 XL features improved battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Google Pixel 4 XL is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.