Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than Xperia XZs, with an 87.5 score against 77.2. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a just a little heavier phone than Xperia XZs, but they are 0.32inches thick. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little more vivid screen than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a larger display.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bigger storage for applications and games than Xperia XZs, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little faster CPU than Xperia XZs, because it has 4 more cores and more RAM. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with superior battery life than Xperia XZs, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Xperia XZs takes way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xperia XZs also counts with a bigger sensor providing a better image quality, a lot more MP camera and faster 960 fps video frame rates.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 4a 5G is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.