Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is better than Xperia XZs, having an 89 score against 77.2. The Google Pixel 5 construction is noticeably newer, just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than Xperia XZs. Google Pixel 5 features a little bit better performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 has just a bit better display than Xperia XZs, because it has a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a just a little higher pixels density and a larger screen. Google Pixel 5 has a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia XZs, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Sony Xperia XZs counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the Sony Xperia XZs also counts with better video frame rates, a way more MP camera and a larger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
Google Pixel 5 features a much better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Google Pixel 5 is also by far the cheapest, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.