Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-04-05 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is slightly better than the Xperia XZs, with a general score of 82.7 against 77.2. The LG G8X ThinQ body is a lot newer than the Xperia XZs's, but it is just a little thicker and heavier. LG G8X ThinQ has a little bit better display than Xperia XZs, because although it has a just a bit lower amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bigger display.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little bit better performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG G8X ThinQ features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much longer battery duration than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2900mAh. The Xperia XZs counts with a very superior camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for taking images and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xperia XZs also counts with a larger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures, a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and higher 960 frames per second video frame rates.
The LG G8X ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.