Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Titan gray |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.87 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is much better than the Xperia XZs, getting a general score of 85.4 against 77.2. Although the LG K92 is noticeably newer than the Xperia XZs, it is much heavier and just a bit thicker. The Xperia XZs features a little bit better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density.
The LG K92 features a little better hardware performance than Xperia XZs, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores. LG K92 has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Xperia XZs, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG K92 features a much longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZs, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh. The Xperia XZs captures a little bit better pictures and videos than LG K92, although it has a camera with lot less MP, a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs or videos in poorly lited environments, a tinier back camera sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality and a worse (4K) video resolution.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG K92 is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.