Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| 2017-04-05 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the Xperia XZs's 77.2 overall score. The LG V35 ThinQ is a newer cellphone, and it's also a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Xperia XZs. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little sharper screen than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a better pixels amount in each inch in the screen, a bigger display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage.
LG V35 ThinQ features a bit longer battery life than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh. Xperia XZs has a very superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing images or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xperia XZs also counts with higher 960 frames per second video frame rate, a back-facing camera with a higher resolution and a way bigger sensor taking lot higher quality photographs.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the LG V35 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.