Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a general score of 81.2, which is a bit better than the Sony Xperia XZs's 77.2 overall score. LG V40 ThinQ is a newer and a little bit thinner phone than the Sony Xperia XZs, although it's a little heavier. The LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better display than Xperia XZs, because it has a better screen pixels density, a larger screen and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
LG V40 ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xperia XZs, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
LG V40 ThinQ features a bit superior battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh. The Xperia XZs captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a way smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xperia XZs also counts with a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and higher video frame rates.
The LG V40 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.