Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than Sony Xperia XZs, having a global score of 87.1 against 77.2. LG Velvet's design is newer and a little bit thinner than Sony Xperia XZs's, but it is also somewhat heavier. LG Velvet features a little bit better processing power than Xperia XZs, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Sony Xperia XZs and LG Velvet both have extremely similar screens, because although the LG Velvet has a just a little worse display pixel density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a really bigger screen. LG Velvet has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Sony Xperia XZs shoots better photos and videos than LG Velvet, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing pictures or video in low light environments, a tinier camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photos, a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back camera with way less mega pixels resolution.
LG Velvet counts with a much longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
LG Velvet is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.