Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is better than Xperia XZs, having an 89.6 score against 77.2. The Motorola edge construction is newer than the Xperia XZs's, although it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The Motorola edge counts with a little bit better processing power than Xperia XZs, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM.
The Sony Xperia XZs has a little more vivid display than Motorola edge, because although it has a much smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels density. The Xperia XZs shoots slightly better videos and photos than Motorola edge, although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, a way smaller back-facing camera sensor providing a much lower image quality, a worse video definition and a back facing camera with a lot lower 19 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola edge features a much greater memory for games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. Motorola edge has a really longer battery life than Xperia XZs, because it has a 55% greater battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Motorola edge is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.