Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.87 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Xperia XZs, with a overall score of 87.1 against 77.2. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is notably newer, but a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Xperia XZs. The Xperia XZs features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 4 lesser cores (although faster) and lesser RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more vivid screen than Xperia XZs, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger display. Sony Xperia XZs takes a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a back facing camera with way less megapixels resolution, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and video and a much tinier sensor taking less light and washed colors.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZs, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZs, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.