Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPS |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G is slightly better than Xperia XZs, having a general score of 81.5 against 77.2. Moto G 5G's construction is noticeably newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than Xperia XZs. Xperia XZs counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density.
The Motorola Moto G 5G features much more storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 64 GB internal memory. The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a little better performance than Sony Xperia XZs, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has more 2.2 gigahertz processing cores.
Xperia XZs has a better camera than Motorola Moto G 5G, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, a lot lower 19 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a worse (4K) video definition. Moto G 5G counts with a much better battery lifetime than Xperia XZs, because it has a 72% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.