Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Smoke black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZs is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G Power, getting a overall score of 77.2 against 76.1. Xperia XZs is an notably older phone than the Motorola Moto G Power, but Sony managed to build it lighter and thinner anyway. The Motorola Moto G Power features a little faster CPU than Xperia XZs, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola Moto G Power also has 4 more CPU cores.
The Xperia XZs has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density. Moto G Power counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Xperia XZs, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Xperia XZs features a greater camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xperia XZs also counts with higher 960 fps video frame rates, a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with more mega pixels.
The Moto G Power has a much longer battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Sony Xperia XZs is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Power. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Moto G Power, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.