Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZs has an overall score of 77.2, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power's general score of 76. The Xperia XZs construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G8 Power, although it was released 3 years before. Moto G8 Power features just a bit better performance than Sony Xperia XZs, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G8 Power also has a larger number of cores (although slower).
Xperia XZs features a slightly better looking display than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher screen pixels density. The Sony Xperia XZs counts with a much better camera than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Sony Xperia XZs also counts with a higher 19 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a bigger camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality and faster video frame rates.
The Moto G8 Power has a much greater storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G8 Power counts with a way better battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xperia XZs is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G8 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G8 Power. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto G8 Power, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.