Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Oxford blue |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G is a bit better than the Xperia XZs, having an 84.6 score against 77.2. The Motorola One 5G body is noticeably newer than the Xperia XZs's, but it is noticeably heavier and a little bit thicker. Motorola One 5G counts with a bit faster processor than Xperia XZs, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola One 5G also has a larger number of cores.
Xperia XZs and Motorola One 5G both have really similar displays, because although the Motorola One 5G has a bit inferior count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2520 resolution. The Sony Xperia XZs takes better photographs and videos than Motorola One 5G, although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light images and video, a lower video definition, a tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting lower quality photos and a much less megapixels resolution camera.
The Motorola One 5G has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Motorola One 5G features a much better battery duration than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
The Motorola One 5G is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.