Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a score of 79.8, which is a bit better than the Xperia XZs's general score of 77.2. Even though the Motorola One Hyper is notably newer than the Xperia XZs, it's heavier and a little thicker. Motorola One Hyper counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xperia XZs, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Hyper also has a higher number of cores (but slower).
The Sony Xperia XZs counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Xperia XZs has a superior camera than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, a worse video resolution and a much less MP back facing camera.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Xperia XZs, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola One Hyper features a much longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZs, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Motorola One Hyper is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.