Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| 2017-04-05 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Blue and Brown |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is just a bit better than Xperia XZs, having a overall score of 80.7 against 77.2. Motorola One Vision's design is extremely newer, but heavier and a little thicker than the Xperia XZs. The Motorola One Vision has just a bit better display than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a bigger screen, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a bit higher pixel density.
Motorola One Vision counts with a bit faster processor than Xperia XZs, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola One Vision also has 4 more cores. Xperia XZs has a superior camera than Motorola One Vision, although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and duller colors, a worse video definition, a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photography and a camera with much less MP resolution.
The Motorola One Vision features a much greater storage to install games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 96 GB more internal storage. Motorola One Vision counts with better battery performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 21% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.