Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| 2017-04-05 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is a bit better than the Xperia XZs, getting a score of 80 against 77.2. Motorola One Zoom's body is much newer, but just a little bit thicker and heavier than Xperia XZs. The Motorola One Zoom has a bit superior CPU than Xperia XZs, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola One Zoom also has a greater number of cores.
Sony Xperia XZs features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen. Sony Xperia XZs has a superior camera than Motorola One Zoom, although it has a smaller sensor capturing lower quality photos, a way lower 19 MP resolution camera, a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures.
The Motorola One Zoom has much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has an external memory slot that admits 128 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola One Zoom features a much longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZs, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Motorola One Zoom is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.