Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than the Sony Xperia XZs, having a general score of 87 against 77.2. Motorola razr (2020) is a incredibly newer and just a little thinner cellphone than Sony Xperia XZs, but it's heavier. Xperia XZs counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher screen pixel density and a quite better 1080 x 1920 resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a little better performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. Sony Xperia XZs has a better camera than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, a way less mega-pixels back-facing camera, a smaller sensor shooting lower quality photographs and a lower video resolution.
Motorola razr (2020) has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Xperia XZs has a little longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 2900mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Motorola razr (2020) is way more expensive than Sony Xperia XZs, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.