Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Sonic silver |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZs has a global score of 77.2, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 general score. Sony Xperia XZs's design is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 5S, although it was released many years before. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xperia XZs, because although it has a little bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a better memory for games and applications than Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S features just a little better processing power than Xperia XZs, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 4 more processing cores.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh. The Sony Xperia XZs counts with a little bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 5S, although it has a lot worse (4K) video resolution, a lot smaller back camera sensor shooting much worse quality photographs, a camera in the back with much less mega-pixels resolution and a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos.
Although Xperia XZs is a better device, it is more expensive than nubia Red Magic 5S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the nubia Red Magic 5S. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Xperia XZs, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the nubia Red Magic 5S, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.