Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.87 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than the Xperia XZs, getting a global score of 79.9 against 77.2. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's construction is notably newer than the Xperia XZs's, but it is just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit better looking display than Xperia XZs, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a larger display.
The Xperia XZs counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has less processing cores (although faster) and lesser RAM. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much bigger memory for applications and games than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a really longer battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a 72% bigger battery capacity. The Sony Xperia XZs has a much better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition, a camera with much less MP and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.