Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-04-05 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.87 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A30s has a general score of 79.8, which is a bit better than Xperia XZs's general score of 77.2. Samsung Galaxy A30s's construction is way newer and just a bit thinner, but also a bit heavier than the Xperia XZs. The Sony Xperia XZs features a better display than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a way greater display density.
The Sony Xperia XZs counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A30s, although it has a lower number of cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM. Xperia XZs features a much better camera than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a much worse 19 MP resolution camera in the back and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher video resolution.
Galaxy A30s counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A30s features a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZs, because it has a 38% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.