Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | -- |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.87 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G has a global score of 79.4, which is a little bit better than the Xperia XZs's global score of 77.2. The Galaxy A35 5G design has the same thickness than the Xperia XZs, but it is extremely heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has a just a little worse display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a larger screen.
The Sony Xperia XZs counts with an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 4 less cpu cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Xperia XZs counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a tinier camera aperture, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a smaller back-facing camera sensor giving a lower image quality and a way lower resolution back facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a way better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.