Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| 2017-04-05 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Xperia XZs, getting a general score of 83.8 against 77.2. The Samsung Galaxy A50 construction is newer and just a little bit thinner than Xperia XZs's, although it's also just a little bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a screen that is very similar to the Xperia XZs one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better processor than Sony Xperia XZs, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a larger number of faster cores. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A50 has a much longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh. The Sony Xperia XZs counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a camera in the back with a way lower 19 mega-pixels resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting photos or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy A50 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.