Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-04-05 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is better than Xperia XZs's overall score of 77.2. The Samsung Galaxy A50s is a way newer and just a little bit thinner cellphone than the Xperia XZs, but it's a bit heavier. The Xperia XZs and the Samsung Galaxy A50s both count with quite similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit worse pixels quantity in each screen inch, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features a bit better CPU than Xperia XZs, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and 4 more cores. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a way bigger memory for apps and games than Xperia XZs, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 96 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy A50s has a way better battery lifetime than Xperia XZs, because it has a 38% bigger battery size. The Sony Xperia XZs takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A50s, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, a tinier back camera sensor taking worse quality photos and a lot less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.