Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Prism cube black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is better than Sony Xperia XZs, having a 90.8 score against 77.2. Although the Galaxy A51 5G is extremely newer than Sony Xperia XZs, it is just a little bit thicker and heavier. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Xperia XZs, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more 2200 MHz processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a display that is just as good as the display in Xperia XZs, because although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a quite inferior pixels number per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger screen. Xperia XZs shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a way lower resolution back-facing camera, a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a smaller back camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, they both have the same aperture.
Galaxy A51 5G features much more storage for games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A51 5G features a much better battery lifetime than Xperia XZs, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.