Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| 2017-04-05 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | -- |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is better than Sony Xperia XZs's score of 77.2. The Samsung Galaxy A52 construction is noticeably newer than the Sony Xperia XZs's, although it is a little bit thicker and heavier. Galaxy A52 features a display that's just as good as Xperia XZs's screen, because although the Galaxy A52 has a quite worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features just a bit better processing power than Xperia XZs, because it has more RAM and 4 more cpu cores. Galaxy A52 counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Xperia XZs, because it has a 55 percent more battery capacity. The Xperia XZs captures just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or video in low-light environments, a much less mega pixels camera in the back, a worse (4K) video quality and a much tinier sensor taking less light and dull colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.