Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | -- |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Sony Xperia XZs, with a score of 91.3 against 77.2. Galaxy A52 5G's construction is incredibly newer, but heavier and a bit thicker than Sony Xperia XZs. The Sony Xperia XZs and the Galaxy A52 5G feature similar screens, because although the Galaxy A52 5G has a just a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger display.
Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little faster processor than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Xperia XZs captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, a much smaller sensor taking less light and dull colors, a worse video quality and a back camera with much less mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.