Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is better than Sony Xperia XZs's 77.2 overall score. The Galaxy A52s body is notably newer, but a bit thicker and heavier than Sony Xperia XZs. Xperia XZs and Samsung Galaxy A52s count with really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen.
The Galaxy A52s has a little bit better processing power than Xperia XZs, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Xperia XZs, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A52s features a way better battery lifetime than Xperia XZs, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2900mAh. The Xperia XZs captures slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A52s, although it has a camera with much less megapixels, a lower 3840x2160 video definition, a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and videos in low-light situations and a much smaller back camera sensor capturing way worse quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.