Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| 2017-04-05 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.87 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZs has a score of 77.2, which is slightly better than Galaxy A6's score of 75.8. Xperia XZs is an older and a little thicker phone than Galaxy A6, but Sony was able to make it just a little lighter anyway. The Xperia XZs counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A6, because although it has 4 lesser cores (although faster), it also counts with 1 GB more RAM.
Xperia XZs has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution and a better pixel count in each display inch. The Sony Xperia XZs has a lot better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, it also counts with a back camera with a better 19 megapixels resolution, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy A6 features a bit more memory to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia XZs, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A6 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 400 GB. The Galaxy A6 features a little better battery duration than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Although Xperia XZs is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Xperia XZs, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A6, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.