Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-04-05 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xperia XZs is slightly better than the Galaxy A70, having a 77.2 score against 76.9. Xperia XZs is a way older and just a little bit thicker cellphone than the Galaxy A70, but Sony was able to build it lighter anyway. The Xperia XZs counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a really smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel amount per inch of screen.
The Galaxy A70 features a little bit better processing power than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a greater number of cores (although they are slower) and more RAM memory. Sony Xperia XZs captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images, and they both have the same video resolution, the Sony Xperia XZs also counts with better 960 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger sensor.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A70 features a very superior battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a 55% more battery capacity.
Although Sony Xperia XZs is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A70. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A70, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.