Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 has an overall score of 87.5, which is better than the Xperia XZs's 77.2 global score. Although the Samsung Galaxy A71 is just a little heavier than Xperia XZs, it's a little thinner and a lot newer. The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a little better hardware performance than Xperia XZs, because it has 4 more 2200 MHz CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Sony Xperia XZs has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels number in each inch in the screen. The Galaxy A71 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a way better battery life than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 55 percent bigger battery capacity. The Xperia XZs takes a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A71, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, a way worse resolution camera in the back, a way smaller sensor capturing lot worse quality pictures and a worse (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.